GLOBAL ROUTE CATALOG

Global Server Routes

90+ countries and 200+ routes. Browse by region, city, connection method, and streaming support to verify the exit location and route purpose before connecting.

Start Free View Plans

90+ countries 200+ routes Unlimited simultaneous devices 7-day no-questions-asked refund

ROUTE DIRECTORY

Browse Servers by Region

The table lists representative cities and connection methods. Start by narrowing the options to the region where your target service is located, then compare route types within that region.

QaVPN Global Server Directory
Country	City	Route Type	Streaming
Asia-Pacific Routes
Japan	Tokyo	IEPL	Supported
Japan	Osaka	Relay	Supported
Singapore	Singapore	IEPL	Supported
South Korea	Seoul	Relay	Supported
Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Direct	Varies by route
North America Routes
United States	Los Angeles	IEPL	Supported
United States	San Jose	Relay	Supported
United States	Seattle	Direct	Varies by route
Canada	Vancouver	Relay	Supported
Canada	Toronto	Direct	Varies by route
Europe Routes
United Kingdom	London	IEPL	Supported
Germany	Frankfurt	Relay	Supported
France	Paris	Direct	Varies by route
Netherlands	Amsterdam	Relay	Supported
Sweden	Stockholm	Direct	Varies by route
Other Regional Routes
Australia	Sydney	IEPL	Supported
New Zealand	Auckland	Direct	Varies by route
United Arab Emirates	Dubai	Relay	Supported
Brazil	São Paulo	Relay	Supported
South Africa	Johannesburg	Direct	Varies by route

CONNECTION METHODS

Route Type Is Not the Same as Use Case

IEPL, relay, and direct routes describe how data enters the international network. The actual experience also depends on the exit region, target service, time of access, local network, and client status. Evaluate the route type separately from the intended task.

IEPL Controlled path

IEPL: A More Concentrated Cross-Border Path

IEPL routes use a more concentrated, enterprise-grade access path for the cross-border segment. Compared with routes that rely entirely on automatic public-network routing, they allow operators to organize the relationship between the entry point, cross-border transport, and exit more explicitly. When public networks become congested or routes change, these connections are generally easier to adjust, making them a preferred option for long sessions and sustained transfers.

Typical use cases include remote work, sustained access to international websites, extended video playback, large-file synchronization, and tasks that are sensitive to connection continuity. This does not mean results will be identical from every location or over every local network; local access quality, the target service region, and exit policies still affect the final experience. Judge whether IEPL is suitable by whether the complete task remains stable, not by a brief initial connection result.

IEPL routes require more defined cross-border resources, entry-point scheduling, and operational support, so their service-resource cost is typically higher than that of standard direct routes. Their value lies mainly in path organization and room for fault handling, not in a single fixed speed for every scenario. For frequent video meetings, cloud collaboration, or long-lived connections, start by testing an IEPL route that is geographically close and matches the target region.

View the connection flow → Review plan rules →

RELAY Optimized entry

Relay Routes: Optimize the Entry Before Reaching the Exit

Relay routes add a managed entry point between the user and the overseas exit. The client first connects to an entry point suited to the current network, which then forwards data to the target region. The purpose is not simply to add another hop, but to reduce route fluctuations that may occur when a local network connects directly to a distant data center and to give operators room to adjust entry-and-exit combinations.

These routes suit everyday browsing, streaming, AI tool access, and general office work. For distant target regions, a relay can handle local access and the international exit separately. If an entry point does not match the current network well, another combination in the same region may be available. Relay nodes add a scheduling layer, so route maintenance, entry capacity, and exit resources all contribute to cost, but they can offer a more balanced result between coverage and resource use.

When choosing a relay route, regional matching takes priority over the route name. For North American services, test a North American exit first; for regional services in Japan, Singapore, or South Korea, start with the corresponding Asia-Pacific city. If the goal is simply to read web pages or exchange files, there is no need to use a distant exit. The closer the path matches the target service's geography, the easier it is to avoid unnecessary cross-region traffic.

Back to the regional directory → Check the current exit →

DIRECT Simple structure

Direct Routes: From the Local Network Straight to the Exit

Direct routes use no additional relay entry. The client connects to a server in the target region through the current network's route. This simpler structure suits situations where the path from the local carrier to the target data center is already smooth. For lightweight web access, quick research, backup connections, or less commonly covered regions, direct routes provide a clear and straightforward exit choice.

Direct routes are more sensitive to changes in public-network routing. The same city may produce different results across access networks and times of day, so direct routes are better treated as options to test as needed rather than fixed choices based only on the city name. If a direct route consistently completes the target task, there is no need to switch to a more complex path for the label alone. If pages load incompletely, long-lived connections drop, or video repeatedly re-buffers, test a relay or IEPL route in the same region.

Direct routes use fewer relay-entry resources, so their overall scheduling structure is relatively simple. Their coverage value often lies in regional variety and backup capacity. QaVPN covers 90+ countries and 200+ routes; direct and other route types together form the regional directory, preserving more choices beyond the primary exits.

Choose a route by use case → Start Free →

USE CASE Check each step

Choose for the Task, Not a Permanent Route

Start by asking what task needs to be completed. A route may work well for web browsing but not meet the requirements of regional video content, an AI tool session, or remote work. First identify the target region, then choose the connection method, and finally verify it with the complete workflow. This avoids treating one successful page load as proof that a route is suitable long term.

Everyday Browsing and Research

Prefer a nearby route with an entry point that matches the current network. For browsing, judge the result by complete page loads, normally retrieved images, and continuous access. If a nearby direct route is stable, keep using it; if page resources repeatedly retry, switch to a relay in the same region rather than starting with the most distant exit.

Streaming

First confirm that the account region, target content region, and server exit match, then choose a route marked “Supported” in the table. After connecting, reopen the app or website so the platform can recognize the new exit. Reaching the page does not guarantee smooth playback; also check quality switching, seeking, and continuous playback.

AI Tool Access

AI tools often rely on a login session, web interfaces, and sustained responses at the same time. Choose a relay or IEPL route in a region where the target service is available, and establish a new session after switching. Check whether the login state persists, responses continue without interruption, and uploads and downloads complete properly. If the tool reports a regional or session issue, verify the exit region first, then review browser cache and account settings.

Gaming

For gaming, first identify the game server region rather than looking only at the account-store region. Begin with a route geographically close to the game server and observe input response, connection continuity, and matchmaking during an actual session. Games use different network setups, so a route suitable for web or video may not work equally well for gaming. When the connection fluctuates, compare IEPL and relay routes within the same region.

Remote Work

Office tasks should prioritize connection continuity and a consistent exit. Video meetings, cloud documents, code repositories, and enterprise systems may establish several types of connections at once; changing exits frequently can trigger another login or invalidate a session. Choose an IEPL or relay route that meets the region requirements of your work systems, verify the exit, and keep the route stable until the task is complete.

VERIFY Review results

What to Check After Switching Routes

After switching routes, first confirm that the client shows an active connection, then check the current exit region. Reopen the target website or app to prevent an old session from continuing to use the previous connection. For services that require login, also confirm that the account region, billing region, and exit region comply with the platform's rules. Only a complete flow through login, loading, interaction, and continued use can show whether a route suits the current task.

If the target service does not work normally, first try another route type within the same region. This separates a regional mismatch from a connection-path mismatch. If both relay and direct routes in that region fail, test a nearby region next. Switching repeatedly between distant regions can trigger additional account-security checks and makes it harder to identify which part of the path is causing the issue.

Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux users can access client downloads through the user panel. Unlimited simultaneous devices make it convenient to keep subscription settings consistent across your everyday devices, but each device should still have its exit status checked separately. No email address is required to start; use a username and password. Clients, plans, and subscription details are managed together in the user panel.

Open IP Check → Get the Client →

REGION OVERVIEW

What Regional Coverage Is For

Coverage provides exits in target regions and backup paths. A region name only indicates the exit location; the final choice should also reflect the service region and the current access network.

APAC

Asia-Pacific

Suitable for services in Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Australia, and nearby regions. When the distance is short, compare IEPL and relay routes in the same region first, then use direct routes as a supplement.

North America

Suitable for North American websites, AI tools, cloud collaboration, and regional content. Services may be hosted on the West Coast or in other cities, so use the exit recognized by the target platform as the reference.

Europe

Covers common exits in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Northern Europe. For European regional accounts, office systems, or content services, prioritize the corresponding region.

OTHER

Other Regions

Supports access needs in Australia, the Middle East, South America, Africa, and other areas, while also providing additional regional options for cross-region work and travel.

FINAL CHECK

Judge Route Selection by the Complete Task

The server city determines the exit region, while the route type determines the access path; evaluate both together. For everyday browsing, start with a nearby region; for streaming, match the content region; for AI tools, confirm the service's available region; for gaming, verify the game server; and for work, prioritize a consistent exit.

QaVPN provides 90+ countries and 200+ routes, with unlimited simultaneous devices. If the current route does not fit the task, adjust the connection type within the same region and verify the exit with IP Check. Plans include a 7-day no-questions-asked refund; review the specific subscription and traffic rules on the plans page.

View Plans Start Free